Teacher Salaries, State Collective Bargaining Laws, and Union Coverage
نویسندگان
چکیده
What are the causal effects of collective bargaining (CB) on teacher salaries? This seemingly simple question is difficult to answer because (a) national data measuring school district salaries and collective bargaining is limited in scope, while individual teacher data from the CPS mismeasure CB coverage; (b) union wage effects depend not only on coverage but also on an array of CB law provisions difficult to quantify; (c) union coverage and state CB laws are endogenous since each has been influenced by union sentiment among workers and voters; and (d) OLS estimates of the wage effect of CB coverage and laws may be biased by measurement error and endogeneity. We attempt to address these issues using measures of historical labor sentiment, by creating indices of CB law strength, and by using alternative national data sets containing information on teacher salaries and coverage. As in prior studies, we find modest union salary effects for teachers using standard methods, albeit smaller than found for the private sector. A union benefits premium estimated from SASS substantially exceeds the salary premium. Estimates of CB law and coverage effects using IV (with historical data measuring labor sentiment as instruments) are unrealistically large. We then examine historical data on teacher salaries from 1949 through 2009. We find that in 1959 (the 1960 Census), prior to adoption of state CB laws and subsequent coverage, teacher salaries were higher in states that would eventually adopt CB laws and bargaining. By 1979 all but a few of the states that would pass CB laws had done so. The union salary advantage for teachers increased between 1959 and 1979. Our tentative assessment is that roughly half the 10 percent OLS salary advantage seen for union teachers is causally due to CB laws and coverage, while the other half is not caused by collective bargaining, resulting instead from pre-existing sentiment or other factors correlated with coverage. JEL Codes: I21, J31, J45, J5 Prepared for the “Public Sector Collective Bargaining” session at the American Economic Association Meetings, San Diego, January 6, 2013. We appreciate helpful comments on our earlier draft from William Boal and Gregory Gilpin.
منابع مشابه
Union Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in Germany
Collective bargaining in Germany takes place at either industry or firm level. Collective bargaining coverage is much higher than union density. The share of employees covered by collective bargaining in a single firm can vary between 0% and 100%. This institutional setup suggests that researchers should explicitly distinguish union density, coverage rate at the firm level, and coverage at the ...
متن کاملCapital Structure as a Strategic Variable: Evidence from Collective Bargaining
Market power in the hands of a supplier — such as a labor union — affects a firm’s optimal debt policy. If a firm maintains a high level of liquidity, workers may be encouraged to raise wage demands. In the presence of external finance constraints, a firm has an incentive to use the cash flow demands of debt service payments to improve its bargaining position. Using both cross-sectional estimat...
متن کامل"The Assault on School Teacher Bargaining in Ontario"
Between 1975 and 1997, school teacher bargaining was conducted under the School Boards and Teachers Collective Negotiations Act (Bill 100). By most accounts, the teacher bargaining law was successful in promoting bilateral settlements with minimal strike activity. Following its election in 1995, the Harris government reduced public expenditures and introduced educational reforms. In doing so, i...
متن کاملUnion Density and Varieties of Coverage: The Anatomy of Union Wage Effects in Germany
Collective bargaining in Germany takes place at either industry or firm level. As in the majority of OECD countries, collective bargaining coverage is much higher than union density. Not all employees in a covered firm are necessarily covered. This institutional setup suggests to explicitly distinguish union density in a labor market segment, coverage at the firm level, and coverage at the indi...
متن کاملCollective Wage Bargaining and State-Corporatism in Contemporary China
Collective wage bargaining is an old, yet alien concept for Chinese enterprises. It is old because it was put forward as early as in the 1980s and formalized in the 1994 Labour Law. Nonetheless, collective wage bargaining was alien to most Chinese enterprises because according to the 1994 Labour Law the implementation of collective wage bargaining was voluntary and few enterprises carried it ou...
متن کامل